David Shearer and Francine Pickup, UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), Humanitarian Exchange Magazine 37, March 2007
With the spotlight focused on the political causes and after-effects of the HizbollahIsrael war and the upsurge in the IsraeliPalestinian conflict in 2006, little attention has been paid to the role played by donor assistance to the region. Aid in the Middle East has been motivated by donors political preferences, not humanitarian needs. That intensified markedly during 2006, a shift that also challenges the activities and agendas of aid agencies. This article examines the interconnections between aid and politics, and how they have played themselves out in Lebanon and the occupied Palestinian territories (oPt).
There are some obvious parallels between the IsraeliPalestinian and the IsraeliHizbollah conflicts. In both instances, Israel, with superior firepower, was responding to the abduction of its soldiers by militants within its territory. In both instances, Israel was fighting militants whose organisations had also been democratically elected to their respective governments. Hizbollah draws the bulk of its support from the Shia population, while Hamas enjoys a broader spectrum of support from Palestinians. Both are politicalmilitary organisations, both are Islamic in orientation and both operate extensive welfare networks. Both also share similar origins. Hizbollah grew out of resistance to Israels occupation of southern Lebanon in the 1980s and 1990s, and Hamas drew on Israels occupation of Palestinian territory to increase its influence during the 1990s.
For Western governments, the growing dominance of Hizbollah and Hamas has been deeply problematic. The US and the European Union (EU) passed legislation in 1993 and 2003, respectively, declaring Hamas a terrorist organisation and severely limiting contacts with it. Hizbollah is classed as a terrorist group in the US, but the approach in Europe is more ambivalent. The prevailing policy towards Lebanon by Western and some Arab states has been to counter Hizbollahs increasing influence and strengthen Prime Minister Faoud Sinioras government. In the oPt, the strategy has been to isolate Hamas and actively promote its rivals. A key policy tool in both cases has been aid.
Lebanon
(Read on …)